Wikipedia states: “Lúcia died on 13 February 2005, at the age of 97. After her death, the Vatican, specifically Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (at that time, still head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) [now Pope Benedict XVI], ordered her cell sealed off. It is believed this was because Sister Lúcia had continued to receive more revelations and the evidence needed to be examined in the course of proceedings for her possible canonization.”

SO THE VATICAN, SPECIFICALLY THE CURRENT POPE, ORDERED HER CELL SEALED OFF IN ORDER TO EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE OF REVELATIONS! PERHAPS THE FINGER PRINTS OF GHOSTS NEEDED TO BE EXAMINED!!!

Here again, another very important point must be kept in mind: that nuns take a vow of absolute obedience to the Pope and the Catholic Church, and so did Lucia as mentioned before; thus what Lucia wrote, or perhaps better said, was probably written in her name, during her years as a nun, which as mentioned previously, was her entire life after the so called Fatima event, were most surely in accordance to the commands of the Church. However, considering the order of silence which was imposed on her, it is quite logical to assume that the Church was worried that she might had written additional things that were not approved by the Church; therefore it seems that by sealing off her cell, perhaps the Vatican wanted to make sure that she had not written any thing other than her various writings, directed and published by the Church.

The writings published from Lucia during her life as a nun, in addition to claims of many more apparitions, also included so many details regarding the story of Fatima which she or her cousins had never mentioned at the time of the event in 1917. Among the added details were confirmations of the distorted beliefs of the Church, such as the Trinity which itself is an innovation of the Roman Church dated back to the fifth century C.E., (the Universal Bible Dictionary); i.e. the concept of Trinity was officially decreed over four hundred years after the Prophet ‘Eesa -Jesus- (PBUH).

The origin of the Trinity has its roots in ancient pagan beliefs; some of such trinities which had existed in ancient paganism and polytheism have been listed in many books such as in “Christianity: The Sources of Its Teaching and Symbolism”, London, the 20^th century, by J. B. Hannay

We also cordially invite you to read the article: “Truth behind Easter” in this site kindfather.com in which certain pagan cultures influencing Christianity with their three gods have been briefly mentioned.

Throughout history many people who resisted Trinity in Christianity had been brutally executed; one of such people was a physician from Spain called Michael Servetus who on the 26th October 1553 C.E. at the age of 42 years, with his book The Errors of Trinity tied to his waist, was burned to ashes in Geneva, Switzerland.

In part of his book, he had stated: “The philosophers have invented a third separate being truly and really distinct from the other two, which they call the third Person … and thus they have contrived an imaginary Trinity, three beings in one nature. But in reality three Gods, or one threefold God, are foisted upon us under the pretence, and in the name of Unity ... Admitting therefore these three, which after their fashion they call Persons, they freely admit a plurality of beings, a plurality of entities, a plurality of Essences, a plurality of substances, and taking the word God strictly, they will have a plurality of Gods. . . If this is so, then why are the Tritorites blamed, who say there are three Gods, for they also contrive three Gods or one threefold one ... We have become Atheists, men without any God. For as soon as we try to think about God, we are turned aside to three phantoms, so that no kind of unity remains in our conception ...”

Here is a sample of what the Qur’an says in this regard:

5:73 “Certainly they disbelieve who say: Surely Allah is the third (person) of the three. And there is no god but the One Allah; and if they desist not from what they say, a painful chastisement shall befall those among them who disbelieve.”

To be continued …

Print