Dajjaal … Antichrist

Part 3

Hadrat Haaroon- Aaron- (SBUH) as the brother and first Vicegerent of Hadrat Moosa- Moses- (SBUH) was a significant figure … as narrated by both the Shia and sunni, many times Hadrat Mohammad (SAWA) has mentioned that the Position of ‘Ali to him (SBUT) was the same as the position of Haaroon to Moosa (SBUT) … (Hadith of Manzelat: Kaafi, vol. 8, p.106; …;Volume 5, Book 59, Number 700, sunni sahih Bukhari; …) And that the two first sons of ‘Ali (SBUT) were to have the names of the two first sons of Haaroon, Shabar and Shabbir in Arabic, Hasan and Hosain (SBUT) … (Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 239; Amaali of Shaikh Sadooq, p. 135; …) …

Hadrat Mohammad (SAWA) has asserted that Allah SWT revealed to Moosa (SBUH) to build a pure place of worship in which no one but Moosa, Haaroon and his two sons, Shabar and Shabir should be, and the Prophet (SAWA) then said that Allah commanded him too to build a pure Masjid in which no one but him, ‘Ali and his sons Hasan and Hosain (SBUT) be … (Mostadrak al-Wasaa’el, vol. 1, p. 461; …)

As part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot, the main Hebrew names of the first two sons of Aaron are deceitfully not being presented in the available jewish and christian documents; in the same manner that a deceitful concealment has occurred in regard to the name Paraclete, which we have discussed previously in the E-book “Mohammad and the AhlulBayt (SBUT), the Promise of Bible” in this site: kindfather.com

The Arabic حسن Hasan and حسین Hosain are both from the same root and mean fair, pleasing in appearance, quality and character, beautiful, well, …; so the Hebrew Shabar and Shabbir or Shobair or …  also both should mean the same:

Abarim Publications' online Biblical Hebrew Dictionary:

“The Hebrew root שפר (shapar) means to be pleasing, predominantly to the eye.”

“Its derivatives are:

The masculine noun שפר (sheper), meaning beauty or loveliness.

The masculine noun שופר (shopar) or שפר (shopar) …”

“The rarity of this root indicates we're not dealing with a general pleasantness but something more specific …”

“Strong's Hebrew: 8209. שַׁפִּיר (shappir) – fair”

“Shappir: fair, beautiful”

“Intensive of a form corresponding to Shaphiyr; beautiful -- fair.”

“See HEBREW Shaphiyr

“Forms and Transliterations

“שַׁפִּיר֙ שפיר šap·pîr šappîr shapPir”

So the meaning of Shapar, Shappir and … is the same as the meaning of Hasan and Hosain …

Let us pay attention that in Arabic there is no letter corresponding to p and in its place many times a ب b is used; for instance Paris in Arabic is pronounced Baris باریس.  Thus Shapar with Arabic pronunciation becomes Shabar شبر, and Shappir becomes Shabbir شبیر, and …

So whatever the original root and phonetics for these names were, since old Hebrew had no diacritic symbols …, it is more than obvious that the two Hebrew names شبر and شبیر are indeed equivalent to the two Arabic names حسن and حسین …

It is also noteworthy to mention that some Hadiths indicate that another name of Imam Hosain (SBUH) in previous scriptures was Taab طاب. (Manaaqeb ibn ShahrAashoob, p.166; …)

“Strong's Hebrew: 2898. טוּב (tub) -- good things, goods”

“Concordance. Word Origin from tob Definition good things, goods, goodness NASB”

“Translation best (3), best things (1), bounty (2), comeliness (1), fair (1), glad”

“Strong's Hebrew: 2895. טוֹב (tob) -- to be pleasing or good”

“Root Definition to be pleasing or good NASB Translation any (1), did well (2), done well (1), fair (1), go well (1), good (1), good (5), high (1), merry (3)”

Any how … while, as part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot the original Hebrew names have been concealed, changed, omitted and … from previous scriptures,  yet the epithet Nadab means "generous, giving" (Dummelow, J.R. ed., The One Volume Bible Commentary); and “generous, giving” is equivalent to “Karim” in Arabic, an epithet of Imam Hasan (SBUH). And one wonders if the epithet Abihu originally had the Hebrew word abad (equivalent to ‘Abd in Arabic) between abi and hu which makes it equivalent to AbiAbdillah or AbaaAbdillah, the Koniya of Imam Hosain (SBUH) …

Aaron and his sons in the eyes of bani-Israel were the God-Commanded Vicegerents of Moosa which they arrogantly did not like, so as part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot Aaron and his two sons have been deceitfully misrepresented as sinners … obedience of Moosa was one thing but obeying his brother and his sons too was some thing they resisted … in the same manner reverence and Wilayat of the Last Prophet which Moosa had commanded, he who was not of the children of Israel rather was of the children of Ismael was one thing they- the children of Israel- arrogantly did not like, but reverence and Wilayat of his brother ‘Ali and his sons (SBUT) too was some thing they resisted even more, so as part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot Ismael, Mohammad, ‘Ali, Fatimah and the Infallible Imams (SBUT) have all been misrepresented … (please refer to the E-books: “Mohammad and the AhlulBayt (SBUT), the Promise of Bible”, “Ghadir: Declaration of the Truth, from creation to eternity” and “Names and characteristics of Mohammad, ‘Ali, … and Mahdi in Jewish, Christian and Islamic documents” in this site: kindfather.com)

As for Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot in regard to misrepresentation of the two sons of Aaron: While this very same bible presents Nadab and Abihu as nobles of bani-Israel and claims that they accompanied Moses and Aaron up Mount Sinai and were of those who did not die (exodus 19:21, exodus 24:9-11), and exodus 29:8-9 indicates that God commanded Moses to consecrate them, yet book of leviticus of the bible says:

 10:1 And Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before the LORD, which he commanded them not.

10:2 And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.

So according to the bible the sin of Nadab and Abihu was the use of a so called strange fire for burning incense , and instead of for example the usual bringing of a sin-offering, as the result of this sin a fire from God devoured them and they were immediately consumed by God’s fire!!! While even when, according to bible, Moses and Aaron “supposedly” sinned against God and God was so displeased with them that told them ” ye believed me not” (numbers 20:12), or when “supposedly” Aaron built the calf and caused the children of Israel to become idol worshippers (exodus 32:1-5), a fire from God did not devour them!!!

It is no secret that the so called children of Israel, As part of Shaitan’s tradition, killed their prophets- a fact confirmed by the Majestic Qur’an (2:91, …)- … obviously they also killed Nadab and Abihu, and shamelessly attributed the killing directly to God, so that their martyrdom may remain concealed!!!

AAAAAHHHHH! Shaitan’s malevolent tradition has continued in history … till it reached the accusing, misrepresenting, opposing, torturing, isolating, capturing, usurping, encroaching, and killing of one Infallible Imam (SBUT) after the other … shamelessly it has even gone as far as decreeing that Hosain (SBUH) deserved to be killed … (please refer to the articles “Mourning” and “Another Month of Safar departs while thought-provokingwordsregarding MARTYRDOM of the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH&HP) remain” in this site: kindfather.com)

Hadrat ‘Ali (SBUH) asserted that all the deceitfulness and guile  perpetrated against the Successors of previous Prophets (SBUT), would be perpetrated against him and his sons, the Allah chosen Successors of the Last Prophet of Allah, Mohammad (SBUT) … (Tafsir Jaame’, vol. 7, p. 374 (under verse 84:19); …)

In the Nahj al-Balaaghah it has been stated that Hadrat ‘Ali (SBUH) asserted that he was oppressed as many as the sands of deserts and the plants of earth and …  and that he adopted patience, although as if there was a thorn rankling in his eye and a bone sticking in his throat on seeing his heritage being plundered …

Let us go back to Nadab and Abihu … Matthew Henry, in Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary on the Whole Bible (Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2000, Page 247) in regard to Leviticus 10 says that Nadab and Abihu did what they did deliberately and arrogantly, they were therefore cut off, for the wages of sin is death. He then says that the sin and punishment of these priests showed the “imperfection of that priesthood from the very beginning”.

It is noteworthy to mention that after the Dark and Middle Ages- during which the Catholic Church repressively ruled over Europe- non catholics such as Matthew Henry rightfully rejecting the repressive concept of Papal infallibility- which was the root of all the repression and oppression- have been confused regarding a very vital concept:

Only God bestows the high status and gift of Infallibility upon those He has chosen, and infallibility is absolutely not some thing to be declared by humans regarding a person or by a person himself …

Let us pay attention that papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church that states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error as shepherd and teacher of all Christians. Then in Catholic theology, this self declared papal infallibility has become one of the channels of the infallibility of the Church. They go as far as saying, "Infallibility means more than exemption from actual error; it means exemption from the possibility of error," (P. J. Toner, Infallibility, Catholic Encyclopedia)

As a part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot the position of God-Chosen Infallible Successors of the Prophets have always been usurped by fallible usurpers, as discussed in the E-book “Ghadir: Declaration of the Truth, from creation to eternity”. The point to pay attention is that the Prophet Jesus did indeed, by command of God, declare Peter (Sham’oon Safa) as his Successor, as the shepherd after him, but not only Peter’s teachings were not upheld rather a group of fallible usurpers including Paul and then the popes … declared “themselves” as infallible and caused all the injustice, oppression and …

So another part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition has been the usurpation of true Infallibility …

 and it is as a part of this same old Shaitan’s tradition, that we see that the True Infallibility of the Last Prophet, Hadrat Mohammad (SAWA) has also gone under question by the usurpers and their followers, and so have been the case regarding the Infallibility, as well as the Successorship of the Allah-chosen AhlulBayt (SBUT), and instead the usurpers and their followers have, for instance, been declaring all the Ashaab of the Prophet Mohammad (SAWA) as infallible, while many of the so called Ashaab of the Prophet (SAWA) were sinful as confessed by the sunni themselves!!!

Khalid bin Walid was an example of such sinful Ashaab; the Prophet (SAWA) had once sent Khalid to the Bani-Jodhaymah tribe and had specifically commanded him not to wage war against them, but Khalid disobeyed the direct command of the Prophet and not only tied their hands and killed them but also amputated them -a vicious act which is absolutely forbidden by Islam- … (Sunni documents: Sahih Bukhari, vol. 3; Musnad Ahmad Hanbal; Estee'aab of Ibne AbdulBer; …)

Also according to al-Estighatha by Abu al-Qasim al-Kufi (d. 352 H), Volume 1 page 7, Malik bin Nuwayrah’s (a Sahabi of the Prophet) tribe refused to submit Zakat to Abu Bakr because they believed that they were to submit it to Ali bin Abi Talib (as), the Allah-chosen Successor of the Prophet. Ibn Shazan records in Al-Fadael, page 75 that Abubakr sent Khalid bin Walid to Malik’s tribe to kill him; When Khalid arrived he (Malik) rode on his horse and he was a warrior equal to thousand warriors, hence Khalid was scared of him, therefore he (Khalid) gave him oath, and then when (Malik) dropped his weapon, Khalid betrayed him; he killed him, placed his head in a cooking pot, and fiercely cohabited with his very very beautiful wife on the same night of her husband's murder … discarding Islam's Shari’a with regard to the ‘idda, and  …

So … people such as Matthew Henry, and many after him even today, tired of all the oppression in the name of God, have been confusing this concept and have been saying that imperfection of the chosen was there from the very beginning; i.e. they have been wrongfully falling for Shaitan’s plot and have been assuming that those chosen by God such as Aaron, Nadab, Abihu … and the Infallible Imams are the same as those chosen by themselves such as popes and …

While, those declared by God as Infallible are truly Infallible, but those self declared infallibles are truly fallible … AAAAAHHHHH! The usurpation of the Infallibility of the God-Chosen Infallible Ones has been another damaging part of Shaitan’s malevolent tradition and plot …

The following verse of Qur’an precisely emphasizes on the fact that Allah chooses whoever He Wishes and people have no say in regard to Allah’s choosing, and if people think they have a say in Allah’s choosing they actually associate themselves as partners with God:

Qur’an 28:68 And your Lord creates whatever He wills and He chooses (the Choice remains only with Him) and they have not had the choice. Allah is Glorified (Sobhaan) and Exalted above that which they associate (partner with Allah).

We cordially invite readers to both parts of “Pigeons of his sacred Shrine” in this site: kindfather.com regarding Allah’s special choosing …

Shaitan, in different ways, has been and still is trying very hard that the true Infallible Ones (SBUT)- whose obedience are the same as Allah’s obedience- may not be obeyed, and instead the Shaitan chosen impostors may be obeyed, and thus God is not obeyed and humankind is misled toward the Fire …

To be continued …